Benchmark H2.1
What Contributed to Falling Intervention?
Survey question
You noted that human intervention has gone down. Which of the following contributed?
- Audience
- The 65 buyers who reported human intervention falling over the past 12 months, out of 85
- In depth
- Hypothesis 2 — Interventions Can Be Manufactured
Buyers ranked up to three, so the shares add to more than 100%.
88%
of the robotics buyers whose human intervention had fallen name narrowing the range of tasks the system attempts among the three things that contributed most to falling intervention rates
The 65 buyers who reported human intervention falling
| Category | In top three (%) | Named most impactful (%) |
|---|---|---|
| We narrowed the range of tasks / conditions the system attempts | 88% | 28% |
| We route harder or unusual cases to people before the system tries them | 75% | 29% |
| We slowed things down to make the system more reliable | 71% | 23% |
| We added more human supervision around the edges | 63% | 18% |
| Other | 3% | 2% |
The 65 buyers who reported human intervention falling
Benchmark H2.2
Confidence the Reduction Is Real
Survey question
How confident are you that this reduction reflects a genuine improvement in the system’s autonomy, rather than a narrower set of tasks or more human handling behind the scenes?
- Audience
- The same 65 buyers who reported intervention falling
- In depth
- Hypothesis 2 — Interventions Can Be Manufactured
Single-select, so the shares add to 100%.
89%
of the robotics buyers whose intervention rate had fallen are confident the fall reflects a genuine improvement in the system’s autonomy, rather than a narrower set of tasks or more human handling
The 65 buyers who reported intervention falling
| Category | % of the 65 |
|---|---|
| Very confident | 23% |
| Somewhat confident | 66% |
| Not very confident | 11% |
| Not at all confident | 0% |
The 65 buyers who reported intervention falling
Benchmark H2.3
Whether the Operating Envelope Widened or Narrowed
Survey question
Over the past 12 months, has the range of tasks and conditions the system handles (its “operating envelope”) changed?
- Audience
- All qualified buyers, n=85
- In depth
- Hypothesis 2 — Interventions Can Be Manufactured
Single-select, so the shares add to 100%.
69%
of robotics buyers say the range of tasks and conditions the system handles has widened over the past 12 months
All qualified buyers, n=85
| Category | % of buyers |
|---|---|
| It handles a materially broader range of tasks / conditions | 12% |
| It handles a slightly broader range | 58% |
| About the same | 24% |
| It has narrowed slightly | 4% |
| It has narrowed materially | 0% |
| Too early to tell | 4% |
All qualified buyers, n=85
Benchmark H2.4
Demonstrations as an Indicator of Production Readiness
Survey question
To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following?
- Audience
- All qualified buyers, n=85
- In depth
- Hypothesis 2 — Interventions Can Be Manufactured
Item reported here: “Demonstrations are not a reliable indicator of production readiness.” Single-select, so the shares add to 100%.
69%
of robotics buyers agree that demonstrations are not a reliable indicator of production readiness
All qualified buyers, n=85
| Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All buyers | 27% | 42% | 16% | 13% | 1% |
All qualified buyers, n=85